Understanding of knowledge as primary priority in embarking a new sense of civilisation progress is worth to be understood by all major spectrum of society,thus leaving us with diverse range of questions of' 'what is a knowledge,actually?' and what does it meant for Malaysian?
Therefore, in a micro perspective level,I would like to list the arguments within Malaysian scopes,in order to understand the expansionary process in a localised and understandable manner of our domestic society, in no particular order.
In order to understand the needs for knowledge and its expansionary process in Malaysia, retrospective views of historical accounts regarding social, political and economical scopes of studies must be taken into account for further enhancement,especially in the needs to prioritizes our strands of knowledges for future social construction of our society fabric.
Exploitation is everywhere, discrimination is rampant,
What are we doing in times of wants above the needs?
Is it until when we saw all the illusion to become a reality, then we will be conscious?
Conscious of how bad, that we are actually being treated, and worst, how bad do we treat 'others'.
If the flowers of colours and vibrant bring the sorrows for others, so what do we lives and fights for?
*Flowers can be symbolise as a nation.Do hope that we can digest the meaning.For a better world
The nature of human, to gain profit and to practice racism, for examples, is an unnatural act within the civilized human society, which clearly deteriorate the norms of our most fundamental, and basic social construction mediums and significantly giving regressed effects onto the oppressed entities.
It must be understood, that the roles of certain divisive qualities lays in the roles of exploitation and discrimination regarding the needs of human essentialisms, both in the material and non material segments.
It is best to define human essentialism in two broad and general definitions, which can be categorized into material and non material essentialisms. The first category, which is of human material essentialism, it can be said, it is relatively related to the roles of exploitation, said the labor force.
In this particular conditions, to provide human essentialism in term of material being, the conservative, current means of doing things that is being implemented clearly gives salient divisive edge to both entities implicate, the labor and capitalists, in providing the exact output of material human essentialism, thus stimulating another formation of divisive factors of non material human essentialism, with the methods of discriminations.
As the first result of exploitation oriented methods, the latter effects of discrimination are much more devastated, where the whole pattern of human social construction can solely being build in form of policies and implementations based on sentiments, examples, referring to the extreme ideologies(religions, political views, races, etc) interpretations of and denying the natural nomadic behavior of scattering human population in searching for a better life, in particular for a better human essentialisms edge.
The practices of discriminatory in line with the conscious ignorance and perpetual isolation practices in the society, in the long term prospects will justify the undermining of human essentialisms, in a critical scarcity of human needs, examples, in medical scopes and expansionary of knowledge, and worst, if we are analyzing the discriminatory effects in a much more micro perspectives of a nation.
Human essentialism potential should be based on pure needs, with the exclusion of exploitation and discrimination to be left out from any ideology aspirations, in order to achieve the desire outcome which is not just a mere mirage, but a reality, with the key bridge in between them is the rational tolerances.
It is a total challenge for any ideologue to be perceived perfect in implementations and practices, but the trial and error within any rational interpretations, without a doubt, will soon spark a serious enlightment era to the implicate segment of the society, with the oppressed as the objectives of struggles for the betterment of the sick world of ours.
Recent uprising of a new political bloc, comprises of Brazil, Russia, India and China with the notable acronym of BRIC, and surprisingly the Muslim populated nations of Iran and Turkey, both with a long history of civilizations, will surely chartering a new direction and prospects for the betterment or even an absolute risk of failure within the current hegemonic grips of United States and its loyalist ally, of United Kingdom.
Back with natural resources, strategically located, prominent contributor to advancement of technologies, quality and effective leaderships persona, are some of the qualities in reflections of the progressive new front of forces, but what are the actual prospects for them, in taking up the challenges for making the world a better place with the many challenges ahead.
Critical analysis must be made, through active participation of the world civil society, in order for us, to be benefit under the new flags of power with the whole disciples of human essentialism, can be thoroughly review and intensively implement.
It is the nature of power, to stimulate greed, and it is not an exclusion factor for the listed nation, unless they seriously take the forefront lead in reaching out the empowerment of its society, and best, with the participation of the whole world society within the humanity scopes comprises of their openness to articulate the ideas in economic, politics and socials, with the absolute beneficiary, is the world populations.
The biggest distractions, on reviving the needs, common needs, of the world today, come from the inability of the respective nations in working out within the same framework, for example, in human rights issues, where clearly, some of the potential nations, are still struggling to cope with the demanding needs of human rights issues to be addressed, as continuous refutations by the authorities, and worst, by the people themselves, seriously leading us away from the actual unity in building a serious power to be reckoned with.
In order to achieve the respectable positive output, there must a serious input, starting by the readiness of the top authorities, to address any matter within the scopes of humanitarian essentialisms face by any nations, in inclusive manner, rather than practicing selective exclusivity in order to gain political mileage, thus creating unnecessary consequences regarding the building up process of the much needed regenerated entities to bind people, with the world as its priority.
I do believe that the ongoing practices of divisive factors, within the nations, to protect the so called 'sovereignty' of the country, is an absolute illusion, as the people should be aspired to be guided under the same platform of humanity essentialism, which is the way forward in making the idea to be relevant, in the search for a new base of idealism, with the essentialism based humanity should be prioritized in order to propel the future power, to a new standard of responsibilities.
Justifications through the people participations, on all aspects of societal disciples, economic, and politics, are seen as the main catalyst, in enhancing the needs for democratic platform, in ensuring, that the actual objectives in setting up the new sets of world powers, is not to acquire precedents from the current imperialistic minded nations, unless to emancipate the whole world populations to a higher degree of humanity practices ,not only in their respective countries, but the world as a whole.
It is deemed as a natural and organic process of civilisations to challenge its past, and in order to survive the rigorous process of that, the nature of idealisms practises must be in line with its forces, the society.
However, the ability to withstand and balance the relative position of theory and practice differ from the social and the physical sciences application thus creating a void for reactionary practises, to prevail as a result of failure to content with the progressive nature of its milieu.
Although it is common to experience reactionary practises, as part of the idealisms expansionary process, the inability to interpret and tackle the societal reality of its economical, political and social, at the first place, will only lead to total failure in the survival of the idealisms itself.
The absentees of idealisms, within its scopes of implementation left us, the people with various scopes of reactionary groups to prevail. For a salient example, the failure of capitalism, bring us with another set of idealism, which is the socialism and vice versa, as a result of active reactionary practises within the society.
Society participation, in the process of reactionary practises, must be encouraged, to avoid any totalitarian nature of the governing authorities in working against the essentialism of society needs, in order to build a sustainable scopes of ideology within the relevant principles, with the society, as its primary objective of ideology.
Anything beyond the affiliations of the society, will project to a negative negation for the idealism practises in the process to abide by the nature of the social affiliations, and its ability to tackle the prevailing conflict of interest within the governing authorities and the masses.
The reactionary practises, comprises of societal elements must be stimulated by the humanity approaches, led by virtue of principles of its society, and not by the interference of the ideology as it must be in line with the needs of society essentialisms.
Any resort of reasonable or even anarchist approaches, whether by the government of the people or by the people of the government, must be deemed suitable in instilling the real reactionary of idealisms, to enhance and stimulate the society to the maximum level of understanding to their own set of idealism, and principles.
As a matter of facts, any idealism practises, without the reactionary practises within its scopes of implementations, without confrontations and arguments on its dogma, is destined to fail, as the dependable system in order to rebuilding our corrupted civilisations.
Recent economic downturn of the United States of America, affecting its allies of powers around the world, really was a blessing in disguise for all those in power of our respective country to create and venture into another bilateral and unilateral relationship to distant ouselves, from the hegemony and imperialist politics approaches of the United States and its junior partners allies.
This radical idea of mine in forming a structurally solid government backed by the people centric alliance, are in purpose of creating a more credible, reliable relationship within the nations based on mutual respects, and to uphold the sovereignty of the respective country by the people themselves in order to isolate the power of the modern day imperialist.
The continuous oppression of the United States, especially in terms of their economic policies, were seen as an effective tools in creating a successful divide and rule bloc, by using the means of segregating the integral part of the world society in various exploitation incidences regarding the human rights, which only exposed us, the nations under the so called authorities of the world, both, to their own game of profit, for the allies, and poverty, for those who revolt.
Palestin-Israel conflict, for an example, continue to be the scapegoat of this kind of salient exploitation as a result of our strong dependency on United states foreign policy, deteriorating the functionality of a sovereign country in condemning any forms of human right issues. As a result of this situation, the foreign policy conscience the allies’ nation’s only to a limited scope of physical intervention, except for minimal impact objection, for an example, only during the United Nation meetings.
Worst, any means of democratic measures, involving the humanity means in forms of medical supplies to the badly affected areas of the Palestinian territories also being restricted as it is deem to be seen as against the policy ruled, and roughly being implemented by the United States to the people of Palestin.
It is an absolute shame and disgrace to the entire nation, who practises total silences in order to maintain the authoritive power within their own country, by any shameful means as the exploitation does not stop by stopping the United States only, as the real catalyst of the implementations success, are always the authorities of the nations themselves by agreeing in establishing a puppet regime, by repeatedly turning blind eyes to the real situation and deaf ear to the plight of the oppressed as a result of to satisfy the imperialist state of mind and own lust of power.
Indeed, there is no other suitable time of urging the peoples of all the nations, to have a very serious consideration regarding this situation except for now, by enhancing our respective bilateral and unilateral relationship between nations in creating understanding regarding this situation, to stop, total dependency of the economical grips by building sustainable allies of ourselves.
We must be on the forefront of this idea, through understanding of the real issues, which is our failure in creating an independent economic system, which is currently structurally exposed to various serious exploitation, by the introduction of the free market, which permit the United States of comfortable interference within our national landscape. And the recent economic downturn, I believe was a key turning point for all of us, who believe that egalitarianisms within people of nations should to be put in practices.
However, the questions will remain, whether we are really up to the challenges ahead, by creating formidable alliances, with those who believes that all nations and its people are created equal as to ensure the success of this idea of mine, with a great solidarity from the peoples to abandon the corrupted old regime system.
*As in the proposed idea of mine, I do believe that, the people should be put on top of the nation, to avoid any contradiction and conflict of interest within nation, by merely focusing on the state of its peoples, and the nations, only acts as the common platform of the people.
The understanding of recent terrorist acts occur around the world today can be traced back and analyze based on several integral factors embedded in the issues surrounding the terrorism itself. One of the factor worth to argue lays in our roots of dogmatic, biased understanding of different culture in affiliations within our own media practices.
The media ability in articulating reports regarding terrorism can only make the perception of religious-based terrorism worsen day by day in our new, globalised era of information as in the study by Noam Chomsky on the Iraq invasion by the United States which had created " a sevenfold increase in the yearly rate of fatal jihadist attacks",which clearly justify the needs to reform how the new form of media should be maximized in order to minimize the impact of terrorism,in years to come.
It must be understood by all, that most terrorism acts are being catalyzed, by self ignorance and isolation of the society, towards the roots of dogmatic lies being spread out as a result of sidelining the media potential, as relevant medium in portraying the much needed information.
Various sources of information in revealing the current acts of terrorism, within affiliations scopes, whether it is religion or nation, are something to be condemned off. It must be spared in mind that, terrorism has no affiliation, except as a result of our own affiliation's ignorance.
For an example, take the case of Faisal Shahzad,the alleged terrorist Pakistan born American by citizen. In this particular case, there is a significant growing dillusionment with his own country system failure in addressing the needs in building a bridge of cultural understanding, and the failure of the media in reflecting unbiased information, which is getting scarce day by day and it is not a minority cases affecting our milieu today.
The medium of media information now, is no longer just a mere information carrier, it has being used as an effective political warfare tools in carrying propaganda against terrorism as it is now, but I do believe that this kind of media practice will only produce more harm than good, in infiltrating more damages towards the relation of terrorism and on the implication of affected nation.
The quick allegation of the media especially on terrorism acts in making various statements and claims towards certain affiliations is a sheer regret, as it does implicate a serious complication in fighting and winning the war of terrorism, which is producing more and more potential terrorist as a result of misinformation in affiliations within the terrorist networking, mainly operating where there are continuous suppression and oppression in the region by the so called authorities of the world.
Logically said, why are there continuous occupations by United States, in those region unless to spark a new risk and potential of rebel terrorism?
Is that the only way in spreading the idea of democracy, which is through undemocratic preaches, which is the war?
These are some of the question that the media of the day need to answer, before implicating any acts of terrorism within any scopes of affiliations, in order to divert the war on terrorism to its right place, which is our ignorance in celebrating our own differences.
The failure of civil society in recognizing the much needed reform in projecting the political orientation of our country will lead us into oblivion perspectives in our nation development.
Indeed, the confusion of party, as the platform of nation struggle, should be put to an end in order to path the new way of struggle within the society, which is through their total participation, minus the involvement of the political party as their base of movement.
The struggle movement of the civil society, should instead focus on widen their societal ideologue comprises of nation interest, above any political strand available in our nation political landscape to enhance the effectiveness in overcoming the woes of the nation.
Sets of arguments should be tolerated, by those who believe for truth to prevail, and not unveil, unless by the participation of the society at large and not just confine to the party views and dictatorships of its related authorities figures.
The ability for society to take charge of the political progress of the nation, should be seen as the pure democracy practices and the way forward in relishing the real opportunity of creating a utopia society.
The confinement of party, as the movement of people, should be seen as a deteriorate medium, as the movement of the peoples are being oriented by the rigid party principles, and not the principle virtues of the people themselves.
In order to understand the needs of the party, we should first understand its factor of party's formations, which mainly consists of majority supported affiliations concept, for example, religions, races or even idealism based party.
As stated above, affiliation is the most significant factor of party formation, but how about those in civil society, who have different sets of argument? Are they will be sidelined as a result of the so called majority?
So, how is the process of democracy going to take place, within the confinement of the narrow parties perspectives, when at the first place there is real, significant neglection in our part of society?
It is our time and duty of relishing a total holistic approach of democracy, in celebrating the needs of multi stranded ideology in political orientation by avoiding any forms of selected and biased democracy practices among the peoples of the Malaysian state.
They claimed that, the Malays are being threatened to lose their stake of their own mother soil. Or is it?
Behind every logic, there is reason, and for PERKASA to claim that, they should provide us, the rakyat, with some statistics and facts to support its logics, which they did not and fail to do so, except for playing with sentiment driven propagandas.
I do think and believe that, it is not merely the power, it is the lust of power, within the so called nationalist scope of ideologue, that they are continue to suffer the disillusionment of losing power. It is the protectionism of the Malay Borguise, hiding behind the Malay peasent, in order to tighten and maintain the grip of power, in order to sustain the wealth of the status quo, manipulatic minds of powers within our country.
In order to justify that, we should look at the PERKASA's so called struggle all this while, are they really fighting for the oppressed majority Malay?
I am daring to say NO. Just have a really good sense of mind, and do think.
Justifications of races or any chauvinist minded idealism, as a platform of political struggle is something that we must avoid in relishing the construction of a true Malaysian state, in achieving what, we as a Malaysian really deserve for our country future.
The task in reviving the spirit of the young generation, must be put in line now, for those who believe in real reformation of our country, by thinking above partisan line, but full of principle in virtues of what a reasonable country man, would do and not do, in understanding the real, significant problems lies, in the roots of the Malaysian society.
Egalitarianism in terms of treat is a mere illusion of our struggle as there is no clear hope in our survival, thus making the reality far from convincing unless there is a revolution of society mindset, in understanding of where the problems rooted.
We do and are expecting nothing from those in current authorities, except for continuous aggression and baseless propaganda of 3R,the Races, Royalty and Religions, as the tools of majority manipulative medium, in curbing the vocation of the young people's responsibilities.
The decaying and rotting institutions, of the political, societal and economical milieu of our country, should be seen, as the real opportunity in diverting the axis of traditional power, to the real, dynamic, energetic people’s power led by the young people, with young minds of idealisms.
In fact, it is something extremely very important in creating forces of idealism and forces of implementations, in terms of the masses, with the young people as the catalyst of the movement.
It may be seem to be idealistic in nature, but the nature of the reality now in Malaysia, is a way far more worrying, and if the trends of isolation and ignorance within the young to continue, it will only lead to one thing, the disarray of Malaysia, as the whole nation, and remarkable failure of a fail country once a power to be.
Continuation of the young in making the silent majority a base of their options, are and should not be encouraged, as it is the mental and physical toughness of us, that prevail the true caliber ,in order to address the societal calamities, involving every roots of our nation woes.
Discouragement of the silent majority culture must be seen as the ignition in creating the much needed reformations within the corrupt institutions of ours, by creating significant mobilizations, participation, through holistic approach of the power to behold, on why and how the systems are working within the Malaysian society structural, in general, and the world, as a whole.
History has always repeated itself, and it would not be a failure, for us, the young people to triumph above the stagnant idealisms of the old in creating the world of ours. We should not be the victim of the struggle, unless the victor in our clashes of war.
Circa 1999,the distribution of parliament seat was being made centrically among mixed race constituent, in order to maintain the status quo of the current government after post year 1998 Reformation, mainly to avoid the greater effect of Malay swing vote.
In 2008, the same seat allocation was still in practice, and a greater Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indian swing vote happened, thus making the reduction in traditional government parliamentary seats especially in mixed constituents area.
We can conclude that, the so called nationalist of our country, are willing to manipulate the Malay vote’s bank, by using the issues of Malay supremacy, as their main political issues and continue to divert the needs and priorities of the nation, before parties.
The questions remained on the government side of the day, whether it is true, that they are fighting for Malay centric agenda, or is it just merely a political survival using race, as the camouflage?
I believe that, the justification of power survival is the main motive behind the reshuffling of parliamentary seats on year 1999 general elections, and we should continue our analysis for this upcoming general election, with I am predicting there will be a major overhaul within parliamentary seats in Sabah and Sarawak, in order to maintain the status quo of the government.
Is it the status quo of the so called one race that we are going to defend, or the nation as a whole?
The choice is yours to make.
The failure of three main political parties, Labour Party who reigned the premiership for 13 years, Liberal Democrat Party, the unlikely king maker of British political horsepower and Conservatives Party as led by David Cameron in making the first significant political breakthrough, to gain a comfortable majority and absolute mandate in the last general election of United Kingdom had spark a new dimension of understanding within our political milieu.
The question remains whether is there a new paradigm of understanding the meaning of democracy, in order to stimulate the much needed reform in our political faith?
I believe the answer is yes.
The recent democracy practices of electorate, is the main power in creating the much needed understanding of the new sets of democracy rules, where uncertainty of the government, meant as the real political power for the peoples
It may seem as anarchistic in nature, but the totalitarian state of the government is more dangerous in nature, as the whole state power, are within their own compound.
The real nature of democracy is from the people, for the people, as ruled by Abraham Lincoln and it must be understood, and cannot be underrated by any means of power, except by the people themselves .The utopian society of idealism, are within our reach as the basic roots of democracy, is being revived through the political understanding of ours.
It is time, for us, to have a clear, distinguish facts, in the argument of political government, whether we, the people who are leads, or are we just another political means of manipulation in achieving political consensus among the so called leaders of our day.
The logics behind these issues is that we are too vulnerable for all propaganda that are being spread out by the authorities, in example, how could the united kingdom government allow the continuation of suppression in Iraq, using war as the answer, when at the first place, I believe that most British peoples were against the idea of war at the first place as initiated by the former prime minister, Tony Blair in ordering its troops for an invasion of Iraq, with another allies?
The imbalance of representatives’ numbers in the system of Westminster, should put democracy of principle to their own test, sticking to a more people oriented approaches, in order to create a new significant symbiotic relationship between the people, and the government they have elected.
It would be a blessing of disguise, for those who believes in quality, instead of a strong quantity, if we can really articulate the idea of creating strength within principle as laid by the peoples themselves, implemented by the government, and not by numbers only, as logically said, quality does not mean quantity.
This idea is a pure hypothetical analysis on how we can stretch our power, instead on focusing on the power of authorities, which are supposedly in line with the majority of the peoples.
Hope are something that is not going to make us fail, and the hope in seeing these continuation of electoral trends is hypothetical, in achieving the balance notions between the idea of 'anarchistic' or pure 'totalitarian' in modern day practices of democracy.
Let us hope only the best to prevail.
The first one is the civilisation pioneered by the religious movement and interference.
The second one is being triggered by the development and improvement and knowledge guided by the wisdom of the civilised peoples.
And lastly, the collapse of the civilisation process through the lust guided incompetence characters in articulating the needs of the peoples.
Is there anything that we can relate for our country social standing now, in the wake of the issues regarding the Allah usages for non Muslim to our own state of civilisation?
Clearly, we are not using the first and second one, but we are using the third one.
Do think, and change.
