Urge for All Young People.

The task in reviving the spirit of the young generation, must be put in line now, for those who believe in real reformation of our country, by thinking above partisan line, but full of principle in virtues of what a reasonable country man, would do and not do, in understanding the real, significant problems lies, in the roots of the Malaysian society.

Egalitarianism in terms of treat is a mere illusion of our struggle as there is no clear hope in our survival, thus making the reality far from convincing unless there is a revolution of society mindset, in understanding of where the problems rooted.

We do and are expecting nothing from those in current authorities, except for continuous aggression and baseless propaganda of 3R,the Races, Royalty and Religions, as the tools of majority manipulative medium, in curbing the vocation of the young people's responsibilities.

The decaying and rotting institutions, of the political, societal and economical milieu of our country, should be seen, as the real opportunity in diverting the axis of traditional power, to the real, dynamic, energetic people’s power led by the young people, with young minds of idealisms.

In fact, it is something extremely very important in creating forces of idealism and forces of implementations, in terms of the masses, with the young people as the catalyst of the movement.

It may be seem to be idealistic in nature, but the nature of the reality now in Malaysia, is a way far more worrying, and if the trends of isolation and ignorance within the young to continue, it will only lead to one thing, the disarray of Malaysia, as the whole nation, and remarkable failure of a fail country once a power to be.

Continuation of the young in making the silent majority a base of their options, are and should not be encouraged, as it is the mental and physical toughness of us, that prevail the true caliber ,in order to address the societal calamities, involving every roots of our nation woes.

Discouragement of the silent majority culture must be seen as the ignition in creating the much needed reformations within the corrupt institutions of ours, by creating significant mobilizations, participation, through holistic approach of the power to behold, on why and how the systems are working within the Malaysian society structural, in general, and the world, as a whole.

History has always repeated itself, and it would not be a failure, for us, the young people to triumph above the stagnant idealisms of the old in creating the world of ours. We should not be the victim of the struggle, unless the victor in our clashes of war.

Manipulation of Malay Votes,And Its Effects on Nation.

Circa 1999,the distribution of parliament seat was being made centrically among mixed race constituent, in order to maintain the status quo of the current government after post year 1998 Reformation, mainly to avoid the greater effect of Malay swing vote.

In 2008, the same seat allocation was still in practice, and a greater Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indian swing vote happened, thus making the reduction in traditional government parliamentary seats especially in mixed constituents area.

We can conclude that, the so called nationalist of our country, are willing to manipulate the Malay vote’s bank, by using the issues of Malay supremacy, as their main political issues and continue to divert the needs and priorities of the nation, before parties.

The questions remained on the government side of the day, whether it is true, that they are fighting for Malay centric agenda, or is it just merely a political survival using race, as the camouflage?

I believe that, the justification of power survival is the main motive behind the reshuffling of parliamentary seats on year 1999 general elections, and we should continue our analysis for this upcoming general election, with I am predicting there will be a major overhaul within parliamentary seats in Sabah and Sarawak, in order to maintain the status quo of the government.

Is it the status quo of the so called one race that we are going to defend, or the nation as a whole?

The choice is yours to make.

New Paradigm of Democracy Interpretation,United Kingdom Post Election

The failure of three main political parties, Labour Party who reigned the premiership for 13 years, Liberal Democrat Party, the unlikely king maker of British political horsepower and Conservatives Party as led by David Cameron in making the first significant political breakthrough, to gain a comfortable majority and absolute mandate in the last general election of United Kingdom had spark a new dimension of understanding within our political milieu.

The question remains whether is there a new paradigm of understanding the meaning of democracy, in order to stimulate the much needed reform in our political faith?

I believe the answer is yes.

The recent democracy practices of electorate, is the main power in creating the much needed understanding of the new sets of democracy rules, where uncertainty of the government, meant as the real political power for the peoples

It may seem as anarchistic in nature, but the totalitarian state of the government is more dangerous in nature, as the whole state power, are within their own compound.

The real nature of democracy is from the people, for the people, as ruled by Abraham Lincoln and it must be understood, and cannot be underrated by any means of power, except by the people themselves .The utopian society of idealism, are within our reach as the basic roots of democracy, is being revived through the political understanding of ours.

It is time, for us, to have a clear, distinguish facts, in the argument of political government, whether we, the people who are leads, or are we just another political means of manipulation in achieving political consensus among the so called leaders of our day.

The logics behind these issues is that we are too vulnerable for all propaganda that are being spread out by the authorities, in example, how could the united kingdom government allow the continuation of suppression in Iraq, using war as the answer, when at the first place, I believe that most British peoples were against the idea of war at the first place as initiated by the former prime minister, Tony Blair in ordering its troops for an invasion of Iraq, with another allies?

The imbalance of representatives’ numbers in the system of Westminster, should put democracy of principle to their own test, sticking to a more people oriented approaches, in order to create a new significant symbiotic relationship between the people, and the government they have elected.

It would be a blessing of disguise, for those who believes in quality, instead of a strong quantity, if we can really articulate the idea of creating strength within principle as laid by the peoples themselves, implemented by the government, and not by numbers only, as logically said, quality does not mean quantity.

This idea is a pure hypothetical analysis on how we can stretch our power, instead on focusing on the power of authorities, which are supposedly in line with the majority of the peoples.

Hope are something that is not going to make us fail, and the hope in seeing these continuation of electoral trends is hypothetical, in achieving the balance notions between the idea of 'anarchistic' or pure 'totalitarian' in modern day practices of democracy.

Let us hope only the best to prevail.

On Proposing Realistic Relation Between Studying and Working Milieus.

The understanding of working ethics according to Freidrich Engels is for someone to to enrich themselves in a continuous learning process in order to be independent,to survive in the constant evolution of working milieu.

Significantly,the contradictions of the learning process approaches within the working environment had changed the process and method,and worst,affecting the basic foundation of the process itself,the education,as a whole structure of symbiotic relationship between the relevant of studying and working environment.

Is it only a coincidence that we are seeing peoples are being hindered of their chances in terms of social sphere exposure of studying thus affecting the scopes of works prospects based on the inability to rationalize and adapt the Engels ideas of working ethics?

Or are we facing the ignorance on the most fundamental basis of our social systems comprises of the social,economical and political perception towards the deteriorating efficiency of the systems in use of our current modern society in celebrating the ethics of works as proposed by Engels?

Chances that we are,the majority of the masses of the human race,lagging behind is as a result of continuous discrimination policy in creating salient relationship between working and studying,thus affecting the whole strata of our society in understanding the 'Domino effect' between working and studying in a long term prospects towards the modern civilizations of ours thus rely heavily in our responsibilities to change our way of articulating the power of education.

So what are we doing in order for the consciousness of the people regarding the understanding of the education and working to be achieved,in order to liberate us from denying us of celebrating the diversity of knowledge disciples in studying and the applications during practices to create the much needed relevancy of affiliation between studying and working?

Or is it just a mere illusions of Engels's idealisms himself?

Thoughts on Potential Civilization's Assimilation.

The needs for the emergence of thinking regarding assimilation of civilization should be understand holistically to ensure the survival of the human kind in their own natures and milieus.

The consequences of historical civilizations are one of the most important structures of our historical entities,in understanding the symbiotic relationship between the elements of the civilization,and the discipline applications towards the social sphere milieus itself.

There is a need for thoughts to counter the theory of 'The Clash of Civilization' as proposed by Samuel P. Huntington to ensure the survival of the civilizations to be prevailed by its own qualities and values,and not by its reasons of deteriorations factors.

In order to propose the assimilation factors of civilization,we must first be able to understand the issues comprises of the relevance ideas regarding the subjects hold.Here, I would like to share some of the ideas related to the matter of discussion.

1. How do we integrate the differences and similarities prevail in our history of civilization?
2. Is there any possibilities that the continuous process of civilization can be proceed,without the needs of the civilization destruction?
3. What are the mains catalyst of civilization assimilation factors?
4. How do we articulate and understand the levels and process of civilization in our history?
5. What are the main objectives of assimilation process in relation to the survival of the civilization?
6. How long does does it takes for a civilization to be established based on the universalism of its approaches?

Conclusions are far from being achieved here,as it is only a matter of time,before we can fully understand the actual needs of an assimilations theory for our civilization comprises of the exclusivity and inclusivity of the social sphere to achieve the continuity and survival of the human races.

Youth Isolation of Political Idealisms.

The practicing of political idealisms regarding our society today is a worrying and unhealthy trends of our national landscape in terms of the isolation participation from the youth through the sets of repressive law such as University and College University Acts (AUKU) being imposed on them as a tools to manipulate and means of preserving the status quo of the authorities.

I do believe that it will only lead to two astray condition of our future society,the sheer ignorance and fanactisms,thus affecting the social fabric of our country in creating imbalance strand in terms of healthy developments of political idealisms.

So,what do we have to say regarding this worrying isolation trends of our youth society?

Is it worth of our country future?

Deferring formation of Malaysian identity.

What are the main causes of that situation to our society today?

Is it the anxiety,a feeling of inferiority and suspicion and mistrust of other races,among us all?

What are we doing in term of nation building,except for all the political rhetorics to gain the political mileages?

Where do the suspicion and rejection manifests itself in term of symbiotic relationship of our society?

Do we understand,our own important roles in relishing the objectives of becoming the catalyst of our nation movement?

And at the first place,how do we start the formation of the Malaysian identity?